Hledání osoby: »St Thomas« v Johannis Wyclif Miscellanea philosophica II (Dziewicki)

union. The argument would seem to imply absolute impossibility. But St. Thomas only concludes: “Creatura rationalis ... non habet congruitatem ..." thus

strana: XII

one concerning the existence and the attributes of God. (See St. Thomas, Sum. Theol. 1° P. qu. II, art. 3 in corp.

strana: XIII

be explained with the greatest ease in the sense of St. Thomas and his followers, if we take into account Aristotle's other

strana: XIX

of nature exists only in one singular. If we admit St. Thomas' doctrine that each angel is of a different species which

strana: XXXV

may say that we ought to follow the doctrine of St. Thomas con- cerning Angels, and consequently admit in their case only

strana: XXXV

&c., save by supernatural Power, therefore their Universals are potential. St. Thomas holds that each angel is of a different species; and

strana: 127

illud quod ad aliquid habet diffe- We answer, according to St. Thomas, that the natures of the Angels are such. We can

strana: 129

MS. 11. Abnegal is quite plain in the MS. But St. Thomas, as a rule, abstains from contradicting St. Augustine. The reference

strana: 175

Augustine. The reference is too vague to be found in St. Thomas' writings. 176 JOHANNIS WYCLIF. proporcionabiliter est dare ydeas minus communes

strana: 175

Angels can be only one of each species, according to St. Thomas, and there- fore their Universals are not real, only conceptual,

strana: 189