# parseArgs [![Coverage][coverage-image]][coverage-url] Polyfill of `util.parseArgs()` ## `util.parseArgs([config])` > Stability: 1 - Experimental * `config` {Object} Used to provide arguments for parsing and to configure the parser. `config` supports the following properties: * `args` {string\[]} array of argument strings. **Default:** `process.argv` with `execPath` and `filename` removed. * `options` {Object} Used to describe arguments known to the parser. Keys of `options` are the long names of options and values are an {Object} accepting the following properties: * `type` {string} Type of argument, which must be either `boolean` or `string`. * `multiple` {boolean} Whether this option can be provided multiple times. If `true`, all values will be collected in an array. If `false`, values for the option are last-wins. **Default:** `false`. * `short` {string} A single character alias for the option. * `default` {string | boolean | string\[] | boolean\[]} The default option value when it is not set by args. It must be of the same type as the the `type` property. When `multiple` is `true`, it must be an array. * `strict` {boolean} Should an error be thrown when unknown arguments are encountered, or when arguments are passed that do not match the `type` configured in `options`. **Default:** `true`. * `allowPositionals` {boolean} Whether this command accepts positional arguments. **Default:** `false` if `strict` is `true`, otherwise `true`. * `tokens` {boolean} Return the parsed tokens. This is useful for extending the built-in behavior, from adding additional checks through to reprocessing the tokens in different ways. **Default:** `false`. * Returns: {Object} The parsed command line arguments: * `values` {Object} A mapping of parsed option names with their {string} or {boolean} values. * `positionals` {string\[]} Positional arguments. * `tokens` {Object\[] | undefined} See [parseArgs tokens](#parseargs-tokens) section. Only returned if `config` includes `tokens: true`. Provides a higher level API for command-line argument parsing than interacting with `process.argv` directly. Takes a specification for the expected arguments and returns a structured object with the parsed options and positionals. ```mjs import { parseArgs } from 'node:util'; const args = ['-f', '--bar', 'b']; const options = { foo: { type: 'boolean', short: 'f' }, bar: { type: 'string' } }; const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options }); console.log(values, positionals); // Prints: [Object: null prototype] { foo: true, bar: 'b' } [] ``` ```cjs const { parseArgs } = require('node:util'); const args = ['-f', '--bar', 'b']; const options = { foo: { type: 'boolean', short: 'f' }, bar: { type: 'string' } }; const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options }); console.log(values, positionals); // Prints: [Object: null prototype] { foo: true, bar: 'b' } [] ``` `util.parseArgs` is experimental and behavior may change. Join the conversation in [pkgjs/parseargs][] to contribute to the design. ### `parseArgs` `tokens` Detailed parse information is available for adding custom behaviours by specifying `tokens: true` in the configuration. The returned tokens have properties describing: * all tokens * `kind` {string} One of 'option', 'positional', or 'option-terminator'. * `index` {number} Index of element in `args` containing token. So the source argument for a token is `args[token.index]`. * option tokens * `name` {string} Long name of option. * `rawName` {string} How option used in args, like `-f` of `--foo`. * `value` {string | undefined} Option value specified in args. Undefined for boolean options. * `inlineValue` {boolean | undefined} Whether option value specified inline, like `--foo=bar`. * positional tokens * `value` {string} The value of the positional argument in args (i.e. `args[index]`). * option-terminator token The returned tokens are in the order encountered in the input args. Options that appear more than once in args produce a token for each use. Short option groups like `-xy` expand to a token for each option. So `-xxx` produces three tokens. For example to use the returned tokens to add support for a negated option like `--no-color`, the tokens can be reprocessed to change the value stored for the negated option. ```mjs import { parseArgs } from 'node:util'; const options = { 'color': { type: 'boolean' }, 'no-color': { type: 'boolean' }, 'logfile': { type: 'string' }, 'no-logfile': { type: 'boolean' }, }; const { values, tokens } = parseArgs({ options, tokens: true }); // Reprocess the option tokens and overwrite the returned values. tokens .filter((token) => token.kind === 'option') .forEach((token) => { if (token.name.startsWith('no-')) { // Store foo:false for --no-foo const positiveName = token.name.slice(3); values[positiveName] = false; delete values[token.name]; } else { // Resave value so last one wins if both --foo and --no-foo. values[token.name] = token.value ?? true; } }); const color = values.color; const logfile = values.logfile ?? 'default.log'; console.log({ logfile, color }); ``` ```cjs const { parseArgs } = require('node:util'); const options = { 'color': { type: 'boolean' }, 'no-color': { type: 'boolean' }, 'logfile': { type: 'string' }, 'no-logfile': { type: 'boolean' }, }; const { values, tokens } = parseArgs({ options, tokens: true }); // Reprocess the option tokens and overwrite the returned values. tokens .filter((token) => token.kind === 'option') .forEach((token) => { if (token.name.startsWith('no-')) { // Store foo:false for --no-foo const positiveName = token.name.slice(3); values[positiveName] = false; delete values[token.name]; } else { // Resave value so last one wins if both --foo and --no-foo. values[token.name] = token.value ?? true; } }); const color = values.color; const logfile = values.logfile ?? 'default.log'; console.log({ logfile, color }); ``` Example usage showing negated options, and when an option is used multiple ways then last one wins. ```console $ node negate.js { logfile: 'default.log', color: undefined } $ node negate.js --no-logfile --no-color { logfile: false, color: false } $ node negate.js --logfile=test.log --color { logfile: 'test.log', color: true } $ node negate.js --no-logfile --logfile=test.log --color --no-color { logfile: 'test.log', color: false } ``` ----- ## Table of Contents - [`util.parseArgs([config])`](#utilparseargsconfig) - [Scope](#scope) - [Version Matchups](#version-matchups) - [🚀 Getting Started](#-getting-started) - [🙌 Contributing](#-contributing) - [💡 `process.mainArgs` Proposal](#-processmainargs-proposal) - [Implementation:](#implementation) - [📃 Examples](#-examples) - [F.A.Qs](#faqs) - [Links & Resources](#links--resources) ----- ## Scope It is already possible to build great arg parsing modules on top of what Node.js provides; the prickly API is abstracted away by these modules. Thus, process.parseArgs() is not necessarily intended for library authors; it is intended for developers of simple CLI tools, ad-hoc scripts, deployed Node.js applications, and learning materials. It is exceedingly difficult to provide an API which would both be friendly to these Node.js users while being extensible enough for libraries to build upon. We chose to prioritize these use cases because these are currently not well-served by Node.js' API. ---- ## Version Matchups | Node.js | @pkgjs/parseArgs | | -- | -- | | [v18.3.0](https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v18.x/api/util.html#utilparseargsconfig) | [v0.9.1](https://github.com/pkgjs/parseargs/tree/v0.9.1#utilparseargsconfig) | | [v16.17.0](https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v16.x/docs/api/util.html#utilparseargsconfig), [v18.7.0](https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v18.x/api/util.html#utilparseargsconfig) | [0.10.0](https://github.com/pkgjs/parseargs/tree/v0.10.0#utilparseargsconfig) | ---- ## 🚀 Getting Started 1. **Install dependencies.** ```bash npm install ``` 2. **Open the index.js file and start editing!** 3. **Test your code by calling parseArgs through our test file** ```bash npm test ``` ---- ## 🙌 Contributing Any person who wants to contribute to the initiative is welcome! Please first read the [Contributing Guide](CONTRIBUTING.md) Additionally, reading the [`Examples w/ Output`](#-examples-w-output) section of this document will be the best way to familiarize yourself with the target expected behavior for parseArgs() once it is fully implemented. This package was implemented using [tape](https://www.npmjs.com/package/tape) as its test harness. ---- ## 💡 `process.mainArgs` Proposal > Note: This can be moved forward independently of the `util.parseArgs()` proposal/work. ### Implementation: ```javascript process.mainArgs = process.argv.slice(process._exec ? 1 : 2) ``` ---- ## 📃 Examples ```js const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs'); ``` ```js const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs'); // specify the options that may be used const options = { foo: { type: 'string'}, bar: { type: 'boolean' }, }; const args = ['--foo=a', '--bar']; const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options }); // values = { foo: 'a', bar: true } // positionals = [] ``` ```js const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs'); // type:string & multiple const options = { foo: { type: 'string', multiple: true, }, }; const args = ['--foo=a', '--foo', 'b']; const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options }); // values = { foo: [ 'a', 'b' ] } // positionals = [] ``` ```js const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs'); // shorts const options = { foo: { short: 'f', type: 'boolean' }, }; const args = ['-f', 'b']; const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ args, options, allowPositionals: true }); // values = { foo: true } // positionals = ['b'] ``` ```js const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs'); // unconfigured const options = {}; const args = ['-f', '--foo=a', '--bar', 'b']; const { values, positionals } = parseArgs({ strict: false, args, options, allowPositionals: true }); // values = { f: true, foo: 'a', bar: true } // positionals = ['b'] ``` ---- ## F.A.Qs - Is `cmd --foo=bar baz` the same as `cmd baz --foo=bar`? - yes - Does the parser execute a function? - no - Does the parser execute one of several functions, depending on input? - no - Can subcommands take options that are distinct from the main command? - no - Does it output generated help when no options match? - no - Does it generated short usage? Like: `usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]` - no (no usage/help at all) - Does the user provide the long usage text? For each option? For the whole command? - no - Do subcommands (if implemented) have their own usage output? - no - Does usage print if the user runs `cmd --help`? - no - Does it set `process.exitCode`? - no - Does usage print to stderr or stdout? - N/A - Does it check types? (Say, specify that an option is a boolean, number, etc.) - no - Can an option have more than one type? (string or false, for example) - no - Can the user define a type? (Say, `type: path` to call `path.resolve()` on the argument.) - no - Does a `--foo=0o22` mean 0, 22, 18, or "0o22"? - `"0o22"` - Does it coerce types? - no - Does `--no-foo` coerce to `--foo=false`? For all options? Only boolean options? - no, it sets `{values:{'no-foo': true}}` - Is `--foo` the same as `--foo=true`? Only for known booleans? Only at the end? - no, they are not the same. There is no special handling of `true` as a value so it is just another string. - Does it read environment variables? Ie, is `FOO=1 cmd` the same as `cmd --foo=1`? - no - Do unknown arguments raise an error? Are they parsed? Are they treated as positional arguments? - no, they are parsed, not treated as positionals - Does `--` signal the end of options? - yes - Is `--` included as a positional? - no - Is `program -- foo` the same as `program foo`? - yes, both store `{positionals:['foo']}` - Does the API specify whether a `--` was present/relevant? - no - Is `-bar` the same as `--bar`? - no, `-bar` is a short option or options, with expansion logic that follows the [Utility Syntax Guidelines in POSIX.1-2017](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap12.html). `-bar` expands to `-b`, `-a`, `-r`. - Is `---foo` the same as `--foo`? - no - the first is a long option named `'-foo'` - the second is a long option named `'foo'` - Is `-` a positional? ie, `bash some-test.sh | tap -` - yes ## Links & Resources * [Initial Tooling Issue](https://github.com/nodejs/tooling/issues/19) * [Initial Proposal](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35015) * [parseArgs Proposal](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42675) [coverage-image]: https://img.shields.io/nycrc/pkgjs/parseargs [coverage-url]: https://github.com/pkgjs/parseargs/blob/main/.nycrc [pkgjs/parseargs]: https://github.com/pkgjs/parseargs