1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,000
The person who gets the most votes wins.

2
00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:07,000
Let's talk about this.

3
00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:12,000
In the US, we basically have two choices in elections.

4
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:14,000
And listen.

5
00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:16,000
It's not going amazing.

6
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:17,000
Government shutdown.

7
00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:18,000
Split Congress.

8
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:19,000
Great divide.

9
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:20,000
Camera degree.

10
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:24,000
Two polarized big majorities don't want either one of them running.

11
00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:27,000
Big majorities of us actually don't want the two-party system at all.

12
00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,000
We want more options.

13
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:35,000
But a lot of the time, we actually do have more options.

14
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:40,000
It's just that when it comes time to vote for them, we mostly don't.

15
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,000
We kind of can't.

16
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:48,000
In our system, voting for a third-party helps the party you least agree with.

17
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:50,000
It's just a protest vote.

18
00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:54,000
But there's a way we could make it more than that.

19
00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:59,000
We just need to take a closer look at this.

20
00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:06,000
New England.

21
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:11,000
The North Eastern region of the US about 15 million people live here.

22
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:16,000
These six states send 21 representatives to Congress.

23
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:18,000
And in the 2022 Congressional elections,

24
00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:22,000
36% of voters here voted for Republicans.

25
00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:27,000
None of this region's 21 representatives are Republicans.

26
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:36,000
It means that the perspective of the New England Republicans who have historically been physically conservative and more socially progressive is not reflected in Congress.

27
00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:40,000
This is because of the way we elect representatives to Congress,

28
00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:43,000
where every representative comes from a different district.

29
00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:50,000
Each district holds its own election and in each election person who gets the most votes wins.

30
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:53,000
These are winner-take-all elections.

31
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:55,000
And they produce this result all over the country.

32
00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:57,000
Take the state of Oklahoma.

33
00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:00,000
Oklahoma has five congressional districts.

34
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:02,000
It votes one-third Democratic.

35
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:05,000
It has no Democratic representatives.

36
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:08,000
And before we start blaming Gerry Mandarin,

37
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:11,000
for this, in other words, the shape of these districts.

38
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:15,000
In Massachusetts, which I admit does look kind of Gerry Mandarin.

39
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:19,000
A group of independent matte makers looked at this situation.

40
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:25,000
And they tried to draw new district maps that would give Republicans some representation here.

41
00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:31,000
They found that, though there are more ways of building a districting plan than particles in the galaxy,

42
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:35,000
every single one would produce a 9-0 Democratic delegation.

43
00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:39,000
And now imagine, if in every single house race,

44
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:46,000
there was also a really popular third party getting 25% of the vote in every district in the country.

45
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:51,000
That party would earn zero seats in Congress.

46
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:55,000
If you ask yourself, why have you voted for a third party most of the time as well?

47
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,000
They don't really have a chance.

48
00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:00,000
Our system bids very nature precludes political competition.

49
00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:05,000
But most democracies don't actually work this way.

50
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:10,000
In 2021, a German center-right party called the Free Democratic Party,

51
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:14,000
one about 90 seats in Germany's parliament.

52
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:22,000
German federal elections have about 300 constituencies that work sort of like America's districts with each one electing a single representative.

53
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:30,000
And out of every one of those races, the Free Democratic Party did not win a single one.

54
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:35,000
But Germany uses a form of what is called proportional representation.

55
00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:41,000
Poportional representation means that a share of votes gets you a share of seats.

56
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:45,000
These are four common types of proportional representation.

57
00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:50,000
One way to understand each of them is, are you voting for a person or are you voting for a party?

58
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:56,000
So at one end of that spectrum, in a closed list system, like they use an Spain, for example,

59
00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:59,000
you might not even vote for a candidate, you just vote for a party.

60
00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:06,000
Each party wins some percentage of the vote, and those percentages each translate into a certain number of seats.

61
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:12,000
The people who fill those seats come off of each party's list, so voters don't get to choose those candidates.

62
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:14,000
That's the closed part.

63
00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:21,000
But there are also open list systems, which are maybe the most common using places like Finland, Belgium, Denmark.

64
00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:29,000
A standard version of this is, you vote for a person, and your vote counts towards a larger party total, sort of like we saw before,

65
00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:32,000
determining how many seats each party gets.

66
00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:40,000
But in open list, you do choose the candidates, the seats go to the people in each party who got the most votes.

67
00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:50,000
Germany uses a system called mixed member proportional, mixed because in their system you cast two votes for a person and for a party.

68
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:59,000
Each district elects one person and those people fill some of the seats in parliament, but the rest of the seats are filled by looking at the party vote.

69
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:07,000
And then, dulling the remaining seats out to the parties until the end product is proportional to the party vote.

70
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:11,000
And the last one we'll look at is the one that Ireland uses to elect its legislature.

71
00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:17,000
And this is actually a version of something we're already starting to do in some congressional and local races in the US.

72
00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:20,000
Ranked choice, ranked choice, ranked choice voting.

73
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:25,000
In ranked choice voting, instead of just voting for one person, you rank multiple candidates.

74
00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:34,000
The system that encourages you to vote for smaller parties and less established candidates because if your first choice is on popular, they use your second choice vote.

75
00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:39,000
And that process repeats itself until a certain threshold is reached.

76
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:46,000
On its own, though, ranked choice voting doesn't necessarily make these smaller candidates that much more likely to actually win.

77
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:52,000
They will be at a disadvantage in any election that only one person can win.

78
00:05:52,000 --> 00:06:02,000
If you lower the threshold of victory in a ranked choice race, that produces multiple winners, more proportional to the vote.

79
00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:06,000
All of these systems have different formulas for turning votes into representation.

80
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:16,000
What they have in common is they all distribute power proportionally, instead of just relying on this.

81
00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:21,000
Now, you'll notice we spent the last few minutes talking about Congress and Parliament's legislatures.

82
00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:27,000
Presidential elections can definitely be made more fair that is another video.

83
00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:34,000
But they will always by definition be single winner elections, most likely to be won by the more established parties.

84
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:43,000
But if Congress is more representative and less polarized, it could change the whole partisan dynamic around the presidency.

85
00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:51,000
Right now, if the President wants to pass a law, he or she with rare exceptions needs both Democrats and Republican parties support.

86
00:06:51,000 --> 00:07:00,000
But if there were three or four or five parties in Congress, that would open up far more coalitional possibilities and combinations to pass laws.

87
00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:12,000
The key to making this happen will be taking these single winner elections that we use to elect Congress and replacing them with multi winner elections that pick say three to five people to represent a district.

88
00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:18,000
For example, Oklahoma now five congressional districts could act as a single district, holding an election that five people can win.

89
00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:23,000
It would still mostly be represented by Republicans just not exclusively.

90
00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:33,000
Another option is that we could keep many of our current districts and just make Congress bigger, so use each district to elect more representatives.

91
00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:38,000
But okay, how do we actually do any of this?

92
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:49,000
Federal law currently says that no congressional district can elect more than one representative, so to make Congress more representative, that is what we'll need to change.

93
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:55,000
But that change needs to be made by Congress.

94
00:07:55,000 --> 00:08:07,000
When the country is struggling to even agree on small things, it can feel really unthinkable, but then there are plenty of indicators that being a member of Congress is pretty miserable these days.

95
00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:15,000
Changing the system with wet members focus on a reason they ran for Congress in the first place, serving a community, making sure they get things done.

96
00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:18,000
But there are other ways to change things too.

97
00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:23,000
The states each choose how their own state legislatures get elected.

98
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:30,000
Cities choose how their city councils get elected and the hurdles to changing those are much, much lower.

99
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:39,000
And more experiments, we can try the more different forms of partial representation, we can implement the United States that can be better, ultimately, our democracy will be.

100
00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:47,000
This rule feels really simple, but that simplicity, it hides a lot of problems.

101
00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:51,000
We are one of the oldest, not the oldest democracy in the world, right?

102
00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:58,000
All these different other democracies, most of the world's democracies are using a system that's better, we just need to update our system.

103
00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:01,000
Thanks for watching.

104
00:09:01,000 --> 00:09:10,000
A one really important way that we're able to continue making videos is viewer contributions, support from people who like what we do and want to help us keep doing it.

105
00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:14,000
This month we've put together a video that will actually only be available to contributors.

106
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,000
It's a tutorial video about how to do something very specific.

107
00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:28,000
The way that we animate highlights on documents in our videos, there are actually a couple of videos out there already that attempt to explain how box animates highlights on documents, but they're always get quite right.

108
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,000
Our art director just went ahead and made the definitive guide.

109
00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:40,000
If you have always wondered about that, or if you just want to support us, you can go to box.com slash give now and we will share that video with you later this month.

110
00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:45,000
Thank you again for watching and to so many of you for supporting us.